Abstract
 
A one-stage aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) (Reactor A) and a combined reactor (Reactor B) involving an anoxic
gravel-bed biofilm reactor (GBBR) and an aerobic MBBR were applied to the treatment of heavily polluted river water. Reactor
performance was investigated throughout the experiment for almost 200 days and molecular techniques including PCR-DGGE,
FISH/CLSM and FISH/FCM were used to reveal the evolutions of bacteria community, abundance of nitrifying bacteria and their
spatial distribution in biofilms for the comparative study of the two reactors. Results show that Reactor B performed better than
Reactor A in pollutants removal with COD, ammonia and TN removals enhanced by 6-16%, 32-59%, and 9-31%, respectively.
In addition, Reactor B was more stable towards the increasing of organic and ammonia loadings. The aerobic biofilms in Reactor
B were thinner and occupied by large nitrifying populations (16-41% of the total bacteria) than the corresponding part in Reactor
A (9-22% of the total bacteria). On the whole, the integrated GBBR-MBBR was more efficient and lower-cost compared to the
one-stage MBBR and therefore more suitable for the treatment of the river water.