Abstract
Environmental regulation and its impact on corporate performance have attracted both the Government’s and the academia’s
growing focus. The “Porter Hypothesis” theory shows that environmental regulation would exert direct impact on corporate
performance, while technology progress would compensate for it indirectly. In this paper, we completely and specifically
examines those two effects by setting the three models and creating the interaction variable in the third one. The panel data from
2000 to 2010 in 30 provinces (including the municipalities) of China can be used for empirical tests, and the results do not
support “Porter Hypothesis”, this is partially due to the relatively lower strength of environmental regulation in China, and on the
other side the simple-means of the regulation plus the lack of incentive mechanism.